About ACSE
Join ACSE
Legislation
News
Press Releases
Contact
Resources
Alabama Course of Study: Science
Textbook Disclaimer


Alabama Course of Study: Science (ACOSS) revisions

ALERT! The third and final public comment period is the state Board of Education meeting, starting at 9:30 a.m. on February 10, 2005

Revising science standards for Alabama public schools. Final Comment period is October 2004.

Outline
Calendar
Comments instructions
What's in the draft standards?
The Antievolution disclaimer
Minimal evolution in the standards for grades 9-12
Submitted comments
Lawrence S. Lerner: Detailed review of the 2004 draft standards
Bob Collins: "Analysis of the Preface - loaded with creationist buzzwords"
John Schweinsberg: Comparison of 2001 and 2004 draft standards

Calendar

January 14, 2005:

Final Draft of the 2004 ACOSS standards released for public comment. They are available at the Alabama Department of Education webpage at:

http://www.alsde.edu/html/sections/documents.asp?section=54&sort=21&footer=sections

(Note: be sure to double-check the address, apparently if you have visited other DoE pages it may automatically take you to an older page such as the 2001 version of the standards.)

February 10, 2005:

The third and final opportunity for public comment on the 2004 ACOSS Draft Science Standards. The meeting details:


9:30 A.M., Thursday, February 10, 2005
Gordon Persons Building Auditorium
Montgomery, Alabama




Instructions for Comments

The draft science standards are
available online here from the Alabama Deparment of Education. The current (2001) standards are also available online for comparison.
To download the draft standards: Follow each link to arrive at the page hosting the draft document for the given grade level. The files are RichText (RTF) that should be readable with any word processor. You can probably open the files in your browser, but some of them are large, so it is better to click Right-click, Save As to save them to your hard drive first.

Here are the available instructions for the February 10, 2005 meeting:

January 14, 2005

M E M O R A N D U M

TO: City and County Superintendents

FROM: Joseph B. Morton
State Superintendent of Education

RE: Review of the Draft of the Alabama Course of Study: Science

Enclosed you will find a draft copy of the Alabama Course of Study: Science. This document was submitted to the State Board of Education on Thursday, January 13, 2005. The State Board of Education is scheduled to consider the document for adoption at its regularly scheduled meeting on February 10, 2005. At the February 10, 2005, meeting, the State Board of Education will receive public comments regarding this document.

The draft of the Alabama Course of Study: Science identifies the Grades K-12 required content regarding what students in Alabama should know and be able to do in science at the end of each grade level or course. Please make the draft available to appropriate teachers and staff in your system. Copies of the draft also have been sent to the textbook review sites in the state. A list of the review sites is included for your convenience should anyone contact you regarding the location of a site.

Please contact Mrs. Martha B. Donaldson by telephone at (334) 242-8059 or by e-mail at marthad@alsde.edu if you need additional information.

JBM/MBD/RHB



What's in the draft standards?

The Antievolution disclaimer

Since 1996, Alabama has mandated that textbooks discussing evolution include the Alabama antievolution disclaimer. In 2001, the disclaimer was modified and weakened, but still exists. This modified version is also found in the preface to the draft science standards (01SciTOC.rtf, p. iv). The concluding four paragraphs (out of seven total) of the preface are:


The following position statement regarding scientific theories is included in this document. The word "theory" has many meanings. Theories are defined as systematically organized knowledge, abstract reasoning, speculative ideas or plans, or systematic statements of principles. Scientific theories are based on both observations of and assumptions about the natural world. They are always subject to change in view of new and confirmed observations.

Many scientific theories have been developed over time. The value of scientific work, however, is not only the development of theories but also what is learned from the development process. The Alabama Course of Study: Science was developed within the context of trying to establish scientific literacy, not to question or diminish one's beliefs and/or faith. To that end, this document includes many theories and studies of scientists' works for examination by students. The works of Copernicus, Newton, and Einstein, to name a few, have provided a basis for much of our knowledge of the world today.

The theory of evolution by natural selection, a theory included in this document, states that natural selection provides the basis for the modern scientific explanation for the diversity of living things. Since natural selection has been observed to play a role in influencing small changes in a population, it is assumed, based on the study of artifacts, that it produces large changes, even though this has not been directly observed. Because of its importance and implications, students should understand the nature of evolutionary theories. They should learn to make distinctions between the multiple meanings of evolution, to distinguish between observations and assumptions used to draw conclusions, and to wrestle with the unanswered questions and unresolved problems still faced by evolutionary theory.

There are many unanswered questions about the origin of life. With the explosion of new scientific knowledge in biochemical and molecular biology and exciting new fossil discoveries, Alabama students may be among those who use their understanding and skills to contribute to knowledge and to answer many unanswered questions. Instructional materials chosen to implement the content standards within this course of study should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered.



Minimal evolution in the standards for grades 9-12

Evolution, a fundamental theory of biology, is mentioned a few times in the biology section of the standards, but gets minimal treatment. Following is the subsection where evolution is given the most direct treatment in the standards (Grades 9-12, 06Sci9-12.rtf, p. 46)


BIOLOGY CORE

Students will:

...

9. Differentiate between the previous five-kingdom and current six-kingdom classification systems.
  • Sequencing taxa from most inclusive to least inclusive in the classification of living things
  • Identifying organisms using a dichotomous key
  • Identifying ways in which organisms from the Monera, Protista, and Fungi kingdoms are beneficial and harmful

         Examples: beneficial-decomposers,
                          harmful-diseases

  • Justifying the grouping of viruses in a category separate from living things
  • Writing scientific names accurately by using binomial nomenclature
10. Distinguish between monocots and dicots, angiosperms and gymnosperms, and vascular and nonvascular plants.
  • Describing the histology of roots, stems, leaves, and flowers
  • Recognizing chemical and physical adaptations of plants

         Examples: chemical-foul odor, bitter taste, toxicity;
                          physical-cactus spines, needles, broad leaves
11. Classify animals according to type of skeletal structure, method of fertilization and reproduction, body symmetry, body coverings, and locomotion.

     Examples: skeletal structure-vertebrates, invertebrates;
                      fertilization-external, internal;
                      reproduction-sexual, asexual;
                      body symmetry-bilateral, radial, asymmetrical;
                      body coverings-feathers, scales, fur;
                      locomotion-cilia, flagella, pseudopodia

12. Describe protective adaptations of animals, including mimicry, camouflage, beak type, migration, and hibernation.
  • Identifying ways in which the theory of evolution explains the nature and diversity of organisms
  • Describing natural selection, survival of the fittest, geographic isolation, and fossil record


Submitted comments

Detailed review of the 2004 draft standards by science standards expert Lawrence S. Lerner

In 2000, Lawrence S. Lerner reviewed the science standards for all 50 states for the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a conservative-leaning educational policy group. In "Good Science, Bad Science: Teaching Evolution in the States," Lerner concluded that "[m]ore than one-third of the states get low grades for the standards they have developed for teaching evolution." In 2000, he gave Alabama's science standards a 68%, equalling a "D."

Lerner kindly agreed to review the draft Alabama science standards. In a general evaluation, he gives the draft standards a 40% grade (F), and on the treatment of evolution he gives Alabama a negative score, concluding "[T]he Alabama draft shares with the now discarded Kansas standards of 2000 the dubious distinction of a negative score for the treatment of evolution."

Lerner's comments have been submitted to the Alabama Board of Education, and are available as a series of Word documents on the ACSE webpages here.

Bob Collins: "Analysis of the Preface - loaded with creationist buzzwords"

Bob Collins is the president of Alabama Citizens for Science Education. Here, he comments on the preface to the standards, which includes the text of the 2001 Alabama antievolution textbook disclaimer. He concludes that the preface is "loaded with creationist buzzwords."

Comparison of 2004 draft standards and the 2001 science standards by John Schweinsberg

Alabama Citizens for Science Education member John Schweinsberg compares the 2001 ACOSS standards with the 2004 draft standards, and documents that the treatment of evolution has been substantially weakened.

 
Alabama Citizens for Science Education
P.O. Box 36561
Birmingham, AL 35236
Email: alscience@mindspring.com
Web: www.alscience.org